Daniel Cox vs James Mackinlay Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L L L L W W L L LHead To Head: Cox 1 - 0 Mackinlay
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cox winning 2 and Mackinlay winning 0. The last match between Cox and Mackinlay was at the M25 Sunderland, 31-10-2023, First, I.hard with Daniel Cox getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Cox | 1 |
| James Mackinlay | 0 |
M25 Sunderland(31-10-2023)
6
0
6
3
| Cox | Stats | Mackinlay |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 874 | Ranking | N/A |
| 206 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 34 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (436-284) | Career Total W/L | 33% (15-31) |
| $37,845 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Cox
Player
James Mackinlay
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:52:0 | Average Match Time | 0:52:0 |
| 48% (19/40) | 1st Serve % | 68% (26/38) |
| 89% (17/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 76% (16/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (21/38) | Return Points Win % | 18% (7/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Mackinlay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
James Mackinlay
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
108)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Tailleu
Player
James Mackinlay
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
James Mackinlay
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Matteo Rocci
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Thomas Van Den Dooren
42%
(
25 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Stidell
Player
James Mackinlay
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Hooper
Player
James Mackinlay
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
James Mackinlay
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesse Flores
Player
James Mackinlay
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (436/284) | Win/Loss | 33% (15/31) |
| 57% (948/708) | Sets Win/Loss | 35% (38/70) |
| 53% (8261/7273) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (501/639) |
| 67% (235/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 35% (7/13) |
| 46% (26/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 58% (110/79) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 53% (65/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1106 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 969 | Total Double Faults | 199 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:8:49 |
| 547.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 198.65 |
| 61% (12078/19786) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1409/2431) |
| 69% (8389/12078) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (894/1409) |
| 48% (3724/7708) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (454/1022) |
| 43% (877/2032) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (61/149) |
| 40% (7880/19657) | Return Points Win % | 34% (735/2146) |
| 20% (3/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (13/17) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (72/76) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 66% (348/178) | Futures W/L | 34% (15/29) |
| 60% (424/705) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (15/46) |
| 71% (5/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (109/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
| 62% (134/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 90% (385/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 71% (14/10) |
| 10% (385/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 29% (14/4) |
| 26% (335/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (32/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
